· manager: BlackRockfiled · 10-Kshared book: 60% across 4 vehicles →
Money leaving this fund each quarter — the window a fund actually repurchases on — read off its own filed 10-Q cash-flow statement. Redemptions against the net assets they were redeemed out of, never annualised, so one heavy quarter reads as itself rather than multiplied by four.
$0M redeemed of $318M net assets
These flows are this BDC's own 10-Q cash-flow statement: share repurchases and share issuance, filed quarterly and cumulative year-to-date.
A listed BDC gets no section at all, and that is deliberate rather than a gap — its share repurchases are the manager buying stock back in the market, which is the opposite signal from an investor redeeming at NAV. So a fund with no section here is outside the disclosure, not free of redemptions.
2.5%+ / 5.0%+ of net assets in a single quarter are the live elevated / high edges. The high edge is roughly the whole repurchase window a typical interval fund offers each quarter, and it is the industry-typical offer rather than this fund's own — no filing discloses that at this grain.
Source: AltsVault · SEC filings · as of 2023-12-31
Issuers are matched on normalised name (~10% measured error in each direction), so crowding and overlap figures are estimates inside a band, not exact counts. How this is measured →
| Audax Credit BDC Inc. profile-based only, no holdings overlap | 77% similarƒ |
| Horizon Technology Finance Corp profile-based only, no holdings overlap | 75% similarƒ |
| Afc Gamma, Inc. profile-based only, no holdings overlap | 72% similarƒ |
| Oxford Square Capital Corp. profile-based only, no holdings overlap | 67% similarƒ |
| TCW Star Direct Lending LLC profile-based only, no holdings overlap | 61% similarƒ |
Holdings pending — this fund's Schedule of Investments uses company-specific XBRL tags that don't yet reconcile to its reported total investments, so they're withheld rather than shown imprecisely. Coverage grows as each issuer's tags are mapped.